1. The results of your search
The result of my clickers research was overwhelmingly positive, both by teachers and students who have used them in the classroom. Matt Alman, a 2006 MACUL grant recipient, used the grant money for clickers in his classroom. Alman’s (2007) test “results suggested that using CPS improved the student’s attitudes in class” (p. 41). It went on to say that, “students felt that using the CPS helped them learn better” (p. 41). Alman (2007) also stated that tests that he performed with his high school students showed “an overall average gain of 27% from pretests to posttests” (p. 41).
On the other hand, Margie Martyn also conducted research comparing under graduate college classes that used clickers as an active learning method against those classes that just used class discussion. Martyn’s (2007) results showed that there was no “statistically significant difference” (p. 73) between the posttest results of two groups. Although, according to student survey’s conducted at the end of the course, the group that used the clickers felt that they had learned more from the class than the group who was in the standard class discussion group.
How do students like using clickers as a way to review and start discussions in class? In a survey done by the University of Milwaukee, the UW-System Clickers Project, students were asked their opinions about using clickers in the classroom. Some of the responses included:
- They liked seeing what other students responded when they saw the bar graph of responses.
- The clickers helped them stay awake in class.
- They paid more attention and the class was more engaging.
- They felt that they could participate without feeling embarrassed if they got the answer wrong.
Even though these results were from college students, I’m sure that some of the same feelings would apply to my middle school students, especially the comment about being able to answer questions and participate anonymously. I look forward to comparing my student’s interview responses to those of the college students.
Online I also found a guide from The Ohio State University University with tips for using clickers. This was very useful for me so that I would know how to approach using the equipment in my classroom. I had already thought of many of the ideas on the list, but there were some, such as creating good multiple choice questions and discussing the answer options before revealing the correct answer, that will be helpful as I take on this project in my class.
My whole purpose for trying the clickers was to find a more efficient way to give and evaluate math quizzes for my students. Each article that I read mentioned the fact that one of the benefits of the clicker system was that the “teachers immediately can tell if the class as a whole has learned the material. If the majority of the class misses the question, the teacher may need to reteach the concept before proceeding to new material” (Conoley, Moore, Croom, and Flowers, 2006, p. 46).
However, what seems to be the bigger benefit is that the students feel more compelled to participate when it is done anonymously and they do not have to worry about being embarrassed if they get the answer wrong. This type of question and answer session can be more appealing to the shy students, or to the special education students who may already feel out of place in a general education inclusion classroom. In my own classroom, it is usually those who say the least that need the most help. And if using this type of system to create a discussion and review something they need more help with, then it is worth the time, effort, and cost to use this resource.
2. What you learned from performing this search. For example, which search engines did you use?
I used the search engine Google, the MeL database, and I also searched the MACUL website and Technology & Learning website.
What strategies did you use?
I started out each search by searching clickers, then formative assessment and clickers, student response systems, and finally formative assessment. When I used the MACUL website, first I did a general search on their site for clickers. That search did not offer up much, so I went through their online archives to see if there were any articles in their journal about clickers under the name of student response systems. I did not find anymore than I did on the original search.
What helped or hindered your search?
Many of the articles that I found from the Google search just turned out to just be reviews of the different types of clicker systems, or advertisements for buying them. Plus many of the articles that I found just gave a brief overview of what they were, and not any practical classroom use or advice. The searches through MeL, MACUL, and Technology & Learning website produced more actual articles and research about the clickers. There seems to more information out there about using them at the college level, but I did find some more recent articles that discussed their use in elementary and secondary classrooms.
How would you search again next time?
I would try to use a different search engine that wouldn’t have such a broad area to draw results from, such as one of the search engines that were mentioned in the Valenza article, to see if I could get more articles and journals right off the bat instead of blogs and advertisements.